Tuesday, May 31, 2011

UK House price rise is a Red Herring

Let's look at this with some Common Sense.
Huge tax rises coming in 2012.
People already have less to spend
More people are now border line destitute
More people claiming benefits
First time buyers age is now 38 years old

Does this sound conducive to a house price rise? Of course not, this is a ruse by the Mortgage lenders.

Expect the rental market to be strong and expect record levels of house repossessions in 2012.

With the U.S. housing market falling to 2002 level, expect from now to end 2012 a fall of 10-15% in UK house prices.
So far I have been right, so watch this space!

UK needs to leave the EU now!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/8546493/EU-plans-to-strip-UK-of-bank-regulation-powers.html

With the EU wanting to take ALL power away from the UK the above link is just another example.
A Top Secret mail from Hague to all Foreign Embassies and departments has now warned for the British offices to be aware of the the EU trying to take over.
Certain member sof the EU are now stating that they speak for ALL EU states, which cannot be true as they have to discuss with the UK first before any such statements or decisions being amde by these people.

The Baroness Ashton is a complete waste of of money and effect for the UK. All she does is ask for more money for her Empire to be built. Recently another request for Stg 27 million was made by her.
She adds absolutely NO value for the UK in Brussels and is a parasite of the highest order.

The UK government has to make a decision soon and I MEAN soon to pull out.
The money that the EU is costing us far out weighs the value we get.
There will be requests for billions more sterling over the next 3 years and the onus on us will be about
Stg 2000 a year per family.

This means that no matter what the government says about getting people back to work, the question has to be Why and who is it for? as salaries won't even make the bills.

It REALLY is this bad in the UK at the moment. It's time for protectionism!

Sunday, May 29, 2011

Prime Ministers holidays

In all of my years I cannot remember a Prime Minister in the UK taking so many holidays!
Is this an agreement with Clegg?

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Net immigration to the UK up 45%

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/8538318/Net-immigration-hits-six-year-high-in-blow-to-Coalition.html

Well to the man on the street it isn't surprising that net immigration is up 45%,when we are paying all the minor EEC nationals childrens benefit when the family is back in their own country.Plus they claim from their own country.
It isn't surprising when a Latvian or whoever else can register to sell a homeless magazine in the UK and immediately get unemployment in the UK.

Wake up England!!

Soldiers reduction in Pay

Soldiers returning from Afghanistan are about to have their salaries reduced by 10%.
This seems to go against all that the government are saying of the bravery of our men and ladies.

The Government by doing this, will of course lose support from the Armed Force voters.

I other countries this would lead to a coup!!!

Not the brightest thing to do.

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Marmite and other goods banned in Denmark


Marmite made illegal in Denmark

According to the marketing slogan it is a taste that you either love or hate. But Danes will no longer get the chance to make up their own minds on Marmite after the British delicacy was banned under food safety laws.

Marmite made illegal in Denmark
Danish legislation in 2004 restricted foods fortified with extra vitamins or minerals 
The strongly flavoured dark brown spread made from brewer's yeast has joined Rice Crispies, Shreddies, Horlicks and Ovaltine prohibited inDenmark under legislation forbidding the sale of food products with added vitamins as threat to public health.
Many well known breakfast cereal and drink brands have already been banned or taken off supermarket shelves after Danish legislation in 2004 restricted foods fortified with extra vitamins or minerals.
But Marmite had escaped notice as an exotic import for a small number of ex-pats until the Danish Veterinary and Food Administration telephoned Abigail's, a Copenhagen shop selling British food, to ban the famous yeast spread.
"I don't eat it myself, I don't like it but Marmite was one of our best selling products. Not a day goes by without someone coming in and asking for it," said Marianne Ørum, the shop owner.
"All the English people here are shaking their heads in disbelief and say that it is insane. I agree but it is the law. It's becoming impossible to run a business in this country. We are not allowed to do anything anymore. It is the way Denmark is going."
The shop has now started a "Bring back Marmite" campaign to overturn a ban that is seen as discriminating against Britons living and working Denmark.
Lyndsay Jensen, a Yorkshire born graphic designer working in Copenhagen, told the British ex-pat RedHerring.dk website, that Britons would carry on spreading Marmite on their toast, even if it meant smuggling it in to Denmark.
"They don't like it because it's foreign," she said. "But if they want to take my Marmite off me they'll have to wrench it from my cold dead hands."
The sale of any foodstuff with the "addition of vitamins, minerals and other substances" must be first approved by the Danish authorities after a health scare over their effect on children or pregnant women when combined with other foods with high vitamin levels.
A spokesman for the Danish Veterinary and Food Administration said: "I cannot comment on the Marmite case because our expert is away until Thursday."


I guess Vegemite as well from Australia!!!


Changes in driving for youngsters


Here is another waste of money debate. they quote numbers of death, but they don't confirm that all of them were the fault of the young drivers. The insurance companies will welcome it, not because it will cut the cost of premiums but the fact that premiums will stay high (17 year olds Stg 1500-5000 a year) but because their margins will improve with less claims IF true!

Is this between the ages of 17-25 year olds? it doesn't say. So I suspect this is another survey made on the insurers funding


How can you stop youngsters driving after 11pm?
Should we build cars that have a maximum speed or put limiters on existing cars?
Should we put a tachometer in each car?
Should we ask insurers to cut the insurance polices by 50% if this goes through?

So many IF'S and BUTS!



Radical driving licence changes put to Parliament

By Lois Avery

Imagine not being allowed to drive after 11pm or only being able to carry certain passengers. Well that could become reality for new drivers if a road safety campaign is successful.

Young drivers hit the headlines again this month after a new campaign was launched asking the government to radically overhaul the learn-to-drive system.

Road safety charity Brake is appealing to MPs to make some serious changes to the current scheme, which gives new drivers a full licence after the driving test is passed, from the age of 17.

According to Brake, a revamp of the way driving licences are issued would cut the number of road deaths in the UK by giving motorists better training. In the last ten years alone, there have been 8,109 young lives lost in road accidents.

The insurance industry is supporting the campaign in the hope that reducing road deaths will bring down risk and cut the cost of car insurance for everyone, especially young people and new drivers. In 2010, the Transport Select Committee agreed that better driver training was key to cutting the cost of motor insurance in the long-term.

Nick Starling, director of general insurance and health at the Association of British Insurers, said: “The current learning to drive regime is failing young people, as there is much more to driving than simply passing the driving test.

“Too many youngsters get behind the wheel ill-equipped for unsupervised driving. This is why we have long advocated structured learning to help young drivers build up their driving skills gradually and safely, and graduated licensing for newly qualified drivers.”

Watch this video to see why one bereaved father is supporting the proposals and read on below to see how the changes could affect you.

A common sense columnist!


Here is a columnist who speaks sense and matches what I have said in the past!!


An article in the Daily Mail on Monday 23rd May 2011



Boo me if you like, but it's time to ignore the bleeding hearts and shut down the ministry of foreign aid

Last updated at 11:38 AM on 23rd May 2011

Sometimes, public opinion erupts in ways you least expect. Last Thursday, I took part in  BBC TV’s Question Time programme, which was conducted in an atmosphere of keen anticipation.
On the panel was the Justice Secretary Ken Clarke. Since he was in hot water over his injudicious remarks about rape a couple of days earlier, it was expected there would be fireworks over this issue. In the event, the discussion about penal policy was rather muted.
It was a quite different topic that touched a nerve that evening — overseas aid, and whether its budget should be ring-fenced. 
Making a point: Melanie, left, on Question Time with Jack Straw, David Dimbleby, Ken Clarke and Shami Chakrabarti
Making a point: Melanie, left, on Question Time with Jack Straw, David Dimbleby, Ken Clarke and Shami Chakrabarti
I remared that not only did I think it was wrong to increase this budget when other public spending was being cut back, but that most overseas aid was harmful; that it perpetuated Third World poverty and oppression by propping up tyrants, who as a result were able to murder and enslave even more of their suffering populations.  
So bad was this problem, I added,  that I thought the Department for International Development should be shut down altogether.
The reaction to this was somewhat unexpected. The audience booed me. Not for the first time, however, those making the most noise (a faint cheer went up for me as well) did not seem to represent the views of the wider public.
For since that show, I have been deluged by passionate messages of support — including from some professionals involved with overseas aid — with only a very few expressing any dissent.
Not only that, but when a columnist in yesterday’s Observer expressed horror at my remarks, many of the online readers’ messages even to this Left-wing newspaper were in my favour.
It would seem that the politically canny Defence Secretary Liam Fox knew what he was doing when he protested to the Prime Minister — in a letter that was somehow leaked to the Press — at the proposal to enshrine in law the increase in overseas aid spending,

The point about overseas aid in general is that very little of it goes to help the poor and oppressed at all — quite the reverse 

For this is one of those issues that seems to have got under people’s skin. Almost certainly this is because, when public spending is being cut, people think it is wrong for the overseas aid budget to be increased by around one third.
This increase happens to be roughly the amount which is being taken away from the defence budget. With British forces fully extended in Afghanistan and Libya — whatever one may think of these conflicts — it seems positively obscene to be spending more on overseas aid.
It’s even more bonkers when you consider that bankrupt Britain is borrowing enormous sums from parts of the Third World, such as China and the Middle East, only to give away enormous sums to other parts, such as Africa and Asia. 
Cue a hurricane of harrumphing, humbug and hypocrisy from the world champions in selective sanctimoniousness — self-styled ‘progressives’ whose hearts bleed most profusely for those about whose actual lives they know next to nothing.
To such people, overseas aid has totemic significance because it advertises their own virtue in possessing a conscience.  
This is why Mr Clarke said on the show — to a burst of applause — that Britain’s overseas aid commitment showed it was a civilised country.
Talk about totally missing the point!
Of course, wealthy nations should help others. And in cases of natural disaster — tsunami or earthquake, for example — the Government should certainly provide instant financial and other relief.
But the point about overseas aid in general is that very little of it goes to help the poor and oppressed at all — quite the reverse.
The chief recipient of British aid is India. Yet India is rich enough to afford a space programme, nuclear programme and even its own foreign aid programme. How ridiculous is this?
Aid programmes do little to tackle the root causes of Third World poverty, which are overwhelmingly the behaviour of tyrannical regimes depriving individuals  of democracy and human rights.
Instead, such programmes foster yet more destitution and corruption. Indeed, such need is often manipulated or even created by tyrants or warlords in order to obtain the aid that then enables them to kill and enslave even more people and prop up their corrupt, brutal regimes.
For example, in Rwanda, where the Hutu tribe massacred millions of Tutsis in the Nineties, the Hutus stole as much as 60 per cent of the Western aid and then levied a tax on food rations to pay their militias and thus continue murdering the Tutsis.
Similarly, in Sudan, where two million were slaughtered in the Eighties and Nineties, the army that committed these atrocities fed itself on food aid that it stole, and which thus kept the genocide going.
Absurdly, the Prime Minister claims overseas aid is a good investment because it reduces terrorism. But refugee camps all over the world have turned into paramilitary or terrorist strongholds.
One of the biggest recipients of British aid is Pakistan, which in return has played host to the training camps that have processed countless British Islamist terrorists.
Palestinian refugee camps are the major breeding ground for Palestinian terrorism.
And in Afghanistan, a secret U.S. government report has revealed that nearly £1billion of international aid has gone missing through institutionalised corruption.
The Department for International Development has blocked further British aid there — but not before millions of pounds apparently vanished into a corrupt Afghan black hole.

And now we learn, to our further stupefaction, that the BBC is also in the aid business.
A little-known charity run by the BBC is spending more than £15million a year on aid projects, including educating Africa on climate change and a romantic soap opera for Indian radio.
 The charity, the BBC World Service Trust, employs nearly 600 staff. Last year, it reportedly spent more than £28million on ‘changing lives through media and communication’.
Rub your eyes. This is the same BBC that is decimating its World Service output on the grounds that it has no money! And what price BBC impartiality, if it is not just a commentator on the developing world but also a major player in its development (or lack of it)?
Almost certainly, it would not even occur to the BBC that there can be any argument against this because it subscribes to the progressive ‘group-think’ that believes there can be no argument at all against international aid.
That’s because such folk are incapable of acknowledging that the Third World does terrible things to its own people; they believe instead that it is invariably the victim of the West.
So overseas aid has little to do with relieving the plight of the oppressed. It is instead about alleviating Western guilt and parading consciences on sleeves.
And it has also given rise to the serried ranks of NGOs which, along with human rights law firms, surely furnish the coolest of employment opportunities for the status-conscious liberal.
So when faced with the evidence of the grotesque abuse of aid, the Western progressive resolutely looks the other way.
The public’s striking reaction during the past few days shows they have had enough of being first fleeced in this way — and then smeared as callous flint-hearts when they object. It is yet another stand by the silent majority against our posturing and out-of-touch elites. And once again, politicians ignore this grass-roots protest at their peril.





Thursday, May 19, 2011

when is rape,rape?

there is a lot of press about Kenneth Clarke's comments about rape and the different levels.
I am not a woman but I have to ask is it rape when a wife doesn't consent to sex and when the husband demands it and performs the act, is it rape ?
I am not sure if it's still not a legal charge if married.
However, what about the girls who cry rape as a cover up and they are generally protected but the mans name is all over the place and the stigma, if proven innocent still sticks and has ruined the life of the man.

In this case Mr Clarke made an error and has apologized, but according to the legal system there is a degree to argue and I think is where he was making his synopsis.

We shall see what happens over the coming weeks.

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Sign of things to come with a European controlled armed force

This is incredulous. So it doesn't matter if the person is either a potential terrorist or happens to be in a war zone the Germans don' like the consequences of their intelligence

If you open in Google Chrome and use the translation as I do you can read more

http://www.thelocal.de/national/20110515-35037.html


Germany curbs terrorist intel flow to US

Published: 15 May 11 13:53 CET
The German government is reportedly reassessing the amount of information it is passing on to US authorities, after a German citizen was killed by a US drone attack on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border last year.
According to a report in news magazine Der Spiegel, the German interior ministry stopped passing on information to the US that could lead to the location of German citizens, after last October's deadly attack.

The attack killed three young Islamists in a Taliban camp in the border region of Waziristan. One of them, Bünyamin E., was a German citizen.

Several German courts are investigating the charge of aiding and abetting Bünyamin E.'s murder, some of which are directed at the US secret service, the CIA. Allegations have also been directed at the German secret service, the BND, which reportedly supplied information that led the US to the Islamists.

According the magazine, since this attack, BND information is supplied to the CIA with the caveat that it can only be used to arrest and not kill suspected terrorists who are also German citizens.

At the time of his death, Bünyamin E. was 20 years old and was already under BND surveillance. He had received military training in an Islamist camp in Uzbekistan and was under investigation by the German police on suspicion of preparing a terrorist attack.

Since 2001, all information about suspected terrorists has been routinely passed on to the US.

It is unclear whether a police investigation into the death of Bünyamin E. will be carried out, but under German law, if any German citizen dies by a violent act in a foreign country, the German authorities must investigate it.

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Strauss-Kahn conspiracy

Now I have no idea about the Head of the IMF and his character.
However, with him fighting Sarkozy for the French President title, it wouldn't surprise me that there is some kind of skullduggery.
Let's face it, there is recent proof of this in France, of such things like this happening.

Monday, May 16, 2011

More cut backs to the armed forces

Yet another cut back to th armed forces.
Let me make it absolutely clear, WE CANNOT PROTECT OURSELVES anymore.
Our chain of supply is too thin with too little.

For the government to do this, it will be the biggest ERROR in the history of England!!!

In times of economic woe it should be strengthened with National Service to help us get back on our feet and bring discipline and esteem to our nation.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/8515729/Armed-Forces-face-billions-of-pounds-of-further-cuts-in-additional-MoD-cost-review.html

The Economists are catching up with me

It seems that my initial comment ( I think about a year ago) about the Economy starting to pick up about 2013/2014 is now catching hold.
Economists are paid a fortune for their 'wisdom' where in fact I don't get paid for it and am normally correct!
Now Ernst & Young economist is talking about disposable income being low for some years to come (see link).
I stick with 2014 because these idiots don't use common sense, but models which invariably are flawed.

I guess this is what experience or old age has as an advantage, we have seen it all before!!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/8515298/Consumer-spending-to-remain-subdued-for-another-nine-years.html

Eurovision song contest

Now the Uk as well as European countries fund this pathetic song competition.
each year we say what a load of rubbish as we come low in the scores if we score!
Last Saturday the odds on favourite was from France and it came way down the list.
I only turned on for a few seconds to see Romania score some strange strategic points to countries that didn' have many.
As it happened Azerbijan won. Now since when have we classified this country as European?
I think it's time we split it.
Make a competition for the countries that make the main funding i.e. the countries who founded it instead of the list below - Albania???? Notice Luxembourg are not there who won once!
The rest can have their own and fund it!