Baroness Uddin fiddled her expenses to the tune of Stg 125,000. The largest of any political person or House of Lords.
Now we find out that she is to be taken back to the House fo Lords although she has NOT paid a penny back and says she can't.
She owns 3 properties but won't sell them.
Apparently it is illegal to force her to repay.
So what was the point of the cost to investigate these people and why are they not charged when the man on the street would be locked up for a number of years for a much smaller offence.
She has abused her position.
Could it be that she is of another origin or am I cynical?
Funnily enough Lord Hanningfield was charged with a much less expense offence and was jailed.
It doesn't really take a brain surgeon to see what has happened, does it!
Now we find out that she is to be taken back to the House fo Lords although she has NOT paid a penny back and says she can't.
She owns 3 properties but won't sell them.
Apparently it is illegal to force her to repay.
So what was the point of the cost to investigate these people and why are they not charged when the man on the street would be locked up for a number of years for a much smaller offence.
She has abused her position.
Could it be that she is of another origin or am I cynical?
Funnily enough Lord Hanningfield was charged with a much less expense offence and was jailed.
It doesn't really take a brain surgeon to see what has happened, does it!
No comments:
Post a Comment